Cybercrime Act – a case of all in..?

Should we be concerend by the international enthusiasm to subscribe to Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime – the only international treaty on cybercrime on offer.

There is no arguement that cyber crime is rampant and the ‘less than honest’ are way ahead of the game and comfortably operating in the absence of any real effective legal counter measures. It is difficult proposition, but should Australia commit in a wholesale manner to the first sign of an international effort to address this issue.

Anyway, under probable consideration it is, with the Cybercrime Legislation Ammendment Bill 2011 currently being reviewed by a joint standing committee.

Proceeding as seems likely, it will make extra work for carriers as they will have greater responsibilites and accountabilities in the implimentation of the expansion of the Telecommunications Interception Act – potentially  required to capture and store targeted transmissions for 90 to 180 days , up from 5 days and required to establish processes to enable foreign governments to demand the preservation and handing over of internet and telecommunications usage data under the context of online crime surveillance.

Acceptance of these far reaching behaviours into AU law holds concern as to the precedent of the level of interception afforded to local and foriegn agencies. Prior to the upcoming sitting in front of the High Court, AFACT may very well be rubbing their hands together as it is a further step to impel Carriage Service Providers to be active participants in the act of pursuing identified illegal activity on its network.

40 countries have either signed or become a party to the Convention, including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Japan and South Africa.  A great many more are also using the Convention as the basis to adjust local legislation in response to the rise of cybercrime.

A fear based policy initiative towards a global nation state or a reasonable and balanced application of an international treaty – or a bit of both.

Some associated reading: Expalanatory Memorandum

Recommended Reading – Alone Together

Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other – Sherry Turkle

In a line… the connection between isolation and connectivity. Not specifically Law, but part of the muddle.

“… In Alone Together, MIT technology and society professor Sherry Turkle explores the power of our new tools and toys to dramatically alter our social lives. It’s a nuanced exploration of what we are looking for—and sacrificing—in a world of electronic companions and social networking tools, and an argument that, despite the hand-waving of today’s self-described prophets of the future, it will be the next generation who will chart the path between isolation and connectivity…”

What Vint Cerf Sees In the Internet’s Future

This guy part invented the TCP/IP stack – without which there would be no internet

Great quote.. ‘Just becasue you have been around for a long time, does not mean you have vision’

It’s only when you dont have it

We had a power outage at work today.  Was really interesting to see behaviours change when no access to technology – raid on beer fridge (to protect them from warmth), laughter, juggling of soccer balls and general silliness… very different from screen focused cube passiveness.

Productivity… through the floor – almost an instant surrendering that with out access to a pc there was no point in continuing.

Ok… this has to be taken in perspective, but none the less it is cause for reflection how governing of behaviour is tech and the network.

On the way home my 14 year old rang with internet issues at home… no facebook, no life and doomed to a boring set of meaningless ‘otherness’

me too.

IINet not such big winners after appeal

isp cheat sheet <- Article

In the Federal Court ruling of iiNet v AFACT – Master Chef Emmett prepares the recipe…

“If you want to take on ISP’s in relation to copyright infringement” … Step 1 add water

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.